User blog comment:Nintendo Bro 32/Fantastic... you must look/@comment-30107948-20170617060050/@comment-27062334-20170619152949

>lol, notice how I NEVER mentioned that you were here longer than me and I don't see how this matters.

I got that from your response and it really did piss me off.

>You ask for me to calm down when your the one who's getting 'Pissed' at me.

Does that matter? I begin a lot of arguments with "calm down mate", what's the point of getting mad about that?

>Oh and I'm sorry for using your FULL NAME, I guess it is offensive to call you that for now one.

Lol mate I didn't find it offensive. I found it awkward. I call you Rocky, not Rocky Lobster. It's just weird especially when my name is long. I phrased that part like a joke anyway.

>The whol shit about the grand dad? Use logic, logic is key.

That's not a response; what do you mean? I think you are acting illogically. Where is the lack of logic in the section about the prospector?

>Look I don't want to spend some time ARGUING like you did, and I find it incredibly genrous that you wrote ALL those paragraphs about ME.

I don't understand this. If you choose to elevate an argument, I will carry on if necessary. I feel I was overly generous hence I'm responding in a jokingly and short way this time. Also, you spend some more time arguing anyway, you continue to make and edit comments.

>Anyways at least I didn't edit my comment to make it sound like I am innocent. Such a coward, such a coward.

Okay, so, I did edit my comments because Bot did. I didn't want users to think "what the hell happened here" because Bot blanked his comments. I have no intention of being "innocent" and plus, I did not want to cause more friction between Bot and I.

>I think you should fuck off my friend, your the rude one here.

Okay, so using your logic, don't call me friend, that's not going to solve your case, dumbass. Also, if I was being rude, so are you, in a more extreme way I would argue.

>Come back to me when you can actually make sense instead of blabbering and throwing useless insults.

Did you actually read my comment? Sure there were some insults thrown in when considered necessary, like the part about you being condescending and you being a twit, but they were obviously necessary to make my point (except "you twit" but I thought you wouldn't take that seriously because it was a silly insult), and plus, you insult me much more anyway, and are much more sarcastic. I made good points (and so did you to be fair) in my comment, which you refused to actually argue to because you thought I was blabbering and throwing useless insults.

>And yeah, fuck me, just because I am defending LIBB, but what can you expect from someone who doesn't edit or make fanon here? *cough* *cough* (Substance included).

Who cares that I don't make fanon here? I never really cared about the LIBB thing, and you were "defending" next to nothing. It was a disagreement between Philly and Nintendo, maybe he thinks "testicles" is inappropirate. Who gives a shit about that?

>what can you expect from someone who doesn't edit or make fanon here?

That has nothing to do with anything. I have been a member of this community for nearly four years and have tried (and failed) to make fanon before, although I have contributed to several other peoples' fanon by coming up with plots and leaving reviews and constructive criticism. I have also corrected some mistakes recently but they are not major enough to bring up.

>Now it's time for my edited comment. This argument is going to drag on as you are the source of it.

I would argue that is not true as the "rude-true-yes, but unnecessary" exchange was pretty much finished and recquired no more input from anyone. You can comment on I'm a Rockstar and I'll be fine but it was a bit unnecessary to say it here. You could have said it there and Bot and I would have no problems.

>Any further comment is not needed from you so I would suggest YOU end it here.

Ooops.

Also I would have a bigger problem with welcoming a troll if Nintendo hadn't done anything beforehand.

I would like to stop this argument also however you continue to make points that I would obviously argue with, and claiming it also should be stopped. How may we reach a conclusion, Rocky Lobster?