Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-4975464-20131116065638

So, as we have seen from yesterday, RamDarre has come up with a great way to stop the amount of crossover character article clutter on the wiki that does not involve the workings of the previous idea. His original idea was and is, and I quote from Ram himself:

"If there are no links of the crossover character to SpongeBob in any way, shape, or form, then [the article] can be deleted."

This seems like a legitimate method of handling the excessive build-up of these crossover character articles, yet I want to see what the rest of the wiki thinks. Since I guess that chat discussions are obsolete, we can conjure conclusions and ideas in replies to forum messages.

So, to kick things off, I have decided to state my opinion to get those replies coming in. This quote from myself in from Ram's crossover character compromise thread:

I was thinking [doing this plan as well], yet to prevent possible conflict, we could just add a correlation ourselves if the article is more than 6 months old or hasn't been edited in about that time.

Tell me what you guys think should happen to these crossover character articles. Should they be combined into one page like the idea by Classic Nickelodeon Fan? Should they be deleted altogehter? Should they be deleted only if they lack a correlation to SpongeBob? Tell me what you guys think in a reply.

Can't come up with anything? Then vote on the poll below to facilitate the idea-making process. Once you vote on something, state why in a reply.

What do you think should happen to crossover character articles? They should be deleted altogether The articles should stay and not be dealt with The articles must be deleted if it has not correlation The articles must have a correlation added to it The articles should be condensed into one article Other (reply)  