Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-4975464-20140218234802

So, I've given this some thought, and after countless minutes of math, I have finally averaged out some requirements that could possibly replace the current requirements system that we have. Along with this, there are a few ideas to add to it. So, Support it, be Neutral to it, or Oppose it.


 * Rollback requirements
 * 150 edits on one, single account
 * no bans due to edit concerns, content creation, or derivatives thereof in the past month
 * the support of 3 admins and 2 bureaucrats; if no admins or bureaucrats vote or do not reply to the thread, then a 6-user consensus is to be reached


 * Chat moderator requirements
 * 300 edits on one, single account
 * no bans due to chat misbehavior or misconduct in the past 2 months
 * the support of 5 admins and 3 bureaucrats; 8-user consensus
 * must have rollback rights


 * Administrator requirements
 * must have 800 edits on one, single account
 * no bans due to general wiki misconduct in all considerable categories in the past 4 months
 * consensus of 6 admins and 5 bureaucrats; 10-user consensus if no admins or bureaucrats reply
 * must have chat moderator and rollback rights


 * Bureaucrat requirements
 * 1000 edits on one, single account
 * no bans due to general wiki misconduct in all considerable categories in the past 4 months
 * consensus of 6 admins and 5 bureaucrats; 12-user consensus if no admins or bureaucrats reply
 * must have admin, chat moderator, and rollback rights


 * Overdue process
 * giving users the rights they wish to receive after they surpass the 1000-edit mark without the rights they desire


 * Points system
 * every user is given a certain amount of points for every right that they receive; if a user misbehaves, then they lose a point; if a majority of their points are lost for that right, then they lose a right


 * EXAMPLE: Lipazine110 has rollback rights, and receives 5 points. He misbehaves three times, and only has 2 points. Therefore, he loses his rollback rights because he lost a majority of his points.

Person With Question: What if a user does not have any rights, yet has all of their points?

Then, their points go toward their eligibility for rollback rights. If they maintain their points until they reach 150 edits or regain all their points until they reach said number of edits, they are eligible for rollback rights.

Want to add to this? Want to take away some of this? Then say so in the replies below. Support, be Neutral, or Oppose this idea. I hope that you all think this is a more fair rights requirements system.

-MrScience12 (talk)  