User blog comment:DanzxvFan8275/Proposal 8: For a Social Democracy/@comment-31355616-20191002231317/@comment-26774000-20191003003832

What's fascist is your idea of having the good without the bad. If you're going to propose restrictions on content and such, then be prepared for the many consequences, such as less communication, less development, less room for change, and less of an appeal to users. High restrictions like what you are proposing is why anything that Golfpecks administrates sucks. And as for it being something you've never done, well, you've brought up the idea of removing R-rated content, and considering the detail of your ideology, it actually happening isn't out of the question.

If so, I might consider extending the voting period for this to allow you to make a proposal like that. I have no idea, though.

Relationships can only become toxic because of third-parties. A user outside of that relationship should have no influence in stuff like that, but they were allowed to, which made them cause controversy. That should honestly fall under harassment in a way.

ESB and Community Central's policies are good for them, but we have an entirely different purpose and endgoal. The former is an encyclopedia about a kids cartoon. The latter is a forum or help site for Fandom users. We're a wiki for fan fiction and fan interaction. I don't care if they would've blocked him or not, because our rulesets are entirely different.