User blog comment:Mr. Bailey/Well Hello Again/@comment-30107948-20180504070913

Okay can we be serious here. You're proposing I get demoted for being neutral, meaning my vote wouldn't even count. Yet Philly on the other hand, supported it, and he is fine? This doesn't make any sense.

I clearly state I am not sure and make a temporary neutral vote.

Philly flat out supports it and he is fine.

You're saying I was undecided on allowing strong sexual content violating the TOU. When NC-17 content could be extreme drug use, or extreme violence, which wouldn't really violate the TOU, other than the fact it was under an NC-17 rating.

If we had a rating system like this, G was A, PG was B, PG-13 was B-13, R was C, and NC-17 wouldn't exist but instead there would be Z, with no restrictions other than the TOU, would there be a problem here, no, because NC-17 doesn't exist, there's Z.

Subjecting children to pornography, re-read the last two run-on sentences, then read this.

Is it our fault if parents let children go on there tablets and read pornography? No, it's the parents for not checking the ratings on the pages. There's a rating there for a reason, so parents can make sure it is appropriate for their children to read it. If there was pornography posted, we would blank the page then contact FANDOM.

Now if you excuse me, I'm going to finish writing this NKC episode.