User blog:DontAskWhoJoeIs/BIGGEST Proposal EVER: The User Affected (by harassment) Determines The Punishment

'''Salutations fellow squids and undecided! My name is Not Joe, aka DontAskWhoJoeIs. Happy New Year!!! Here’s a new proposal that if you ask me is MUCH needed and will positively affect every user on SBFW who has recently been harassed by ANY means! This proposal took me about 2 months to write and finalize, so I really hope you enjoy and support it! Here it is...'''

Proposal Additions

'''-If a user has recently been affected by verbal attacks or if an article created by said user gets vandalized by another user, they are fully responsible for reporting it to an administrator and can then choose what punishment the troll/attacker will receive. (For example: if notAnoob3 creates an article for her own spin-off and TROLLMaster7 decides to replace every word with the Bee Movie script in Spanish, it is notAnoob3's job to report TROLLMaster7 to an admin. Once that admin receives and responds to notAnoob3, she can now choose whether she thinks TROLLMaster7 should be blocked for 3 months, Infinitely blocked, just given a warning, etc.) If the article creator doesn't do this, no admins can be held accountable for not making a call to action unless if someone makes a proposal requesting a specific admin that passes.) (Note: This is not enforceable on proposals as the punishments for sock puppetry will remain the same it's always been.)'''

-To get out of a punishment, the user guilty of vandalism or spam is allowed to give away the rights to a spin-off he or she owns to the user affected by what has been done, as long as they accept it.

'''This would make a great new addition to the SBFW policy because it'll remove the stress of finding and distinguishing trolls and verbal attackers from admins, while also being completely fair to the victims, plus it’ll make it so every innocent users who abides by the rules feel just a bit more important, like an admin! And even though admins will no longer be forced to remove user vandalism at the spot, if an admin feels like it would be necessary to do so, they still can.'''

'''Also: if you dislike this revolutionary proposal, instead of voting oppose, it would be much appreciated if you'd tell me what you dislike about it, as I promise I'd edit the proposal to try to make it the best it can be! However, if you do vote oppose that is fine, I'm not pressuring you not to, that wouldn't abide by the rules I proudly stand by! -DontAskWhoJoeIs '''