User blog comment:Mr. Bailey/Proposal: The candid approach/@comment-24412656-20180503160613

This provision makes no sense. If actually passed into law, it'd basically lock us into the same staff we have right now forever.

They won't be able to influence the outcome of a vote in any way? So they wouldn't even be able to try and persuade users to their side? Such a policy would severely limit (if not outright eliminate) discussion of contentious issues. Very bad idea.

How do you prove this?