User blog:Squidnerd/Damn Fool Travis Must Be Stopped

Today, that fool Travis passed an omnibus proposal. If you have no idea what that means, it means he lumped a lot of good ideas (like modifying our childish main policy) with a lot of bad ideas (legalizing NC-17).

So here is what I think should be reverted:


 * Dismantle the SBFWTracker - It's stupid, and the rules are way too strict. I thought Travis was about lessening restrictions, rather than create really absurd stuff with absurd rules. If this passes, than the SBFWTracker would be transferred to Pineapple Entertainment (Travis) as a private company, and he could decide if he could continue it or destroy it.
 * Ban NC-17 Again Travis wanted to indirectly legalize this stuff, calling it his "dirty little secret". There is no reason to post this stuff on a SpongeBob Fanon Wiki, and legalizing NC-17 gives it other privileges, such as nominating it for featured content.
 * Current Policy: This rating has no constraints on sex, violence, drugs and any other offending content. Please note that NC-17 content is in violation of FANDOM's Terms of Use, and posting it is likely to result in a global block.
 * New Policy: This rating has no constraints on sex, violence, drugs and any other offending content. NC-17 content is NOT acceptable on this wiki. Such content will give you a 2-week ban. The bans will get longer after 2 offenses.
 * Overhaul the Featured Content Policy - This is, as Travis says it, "overcomplication". 20th of each month? Ranked-choice-voting? This is utterly ridiculous.
 * Current Policy:
 * If you'd like to nominate something for featured spin-off or article, add it under the appropriate section on this page.
 * Everyone can vote support, neutral, or oppose on these nominations. Neutral votes however won't count.
 * Two seperate elections will be held on the 20th of every month to determine what the featured article and spin-off should be.
 * These elections will last for a week, and will ulitize ranked-choice-voting.
 * New Policy:
 * Two orderly lines will form. Every two weeks, the two at the top of the line would be pitted against each other. The election would take two weeks, and the winner will be on the main page for two weeks. If an odd number of articles are nominated, the last three would be grouped together, and the option with the most votes wins, simple as that.
 * Users will decide which article is more preferable.
 * If there is a two-way-tie, one more week would be allotted with the admin announcing it via highlighted thread. If there is a three-way-tie, Ranked-Choice-Voting would be utilized, with the same announcement method.
 * If a list is empty, a highlighted thread would be sent out by an administrator.

All other parts of Travis' proposal would remain intact.

Because I want the community to point out concerns with this, and cause I want Travis to show me the true power of his so called "politics checker," this proposal would remain open for two weeks.