User blog:SpongeBot678/Demotion Request: NoNameExists

I just want to quickly say that this is, in no way a personal attack on NoNameExists, I do not want this to discourage him from contributing to this wiki. His contributions, for the most part, are completely fine. However, I do not personally think NoNameExists is fit to be an administrator at this moment in time. For the following reasons.

In November 2019, Squidnerd requested for administrator. Jasbre voted neutral stating that: At this point I don’t think you or Travis should be admin because you agree that this drama should continue because it makes the wiki “interesting”. In response to this NoNameExists said "It does completely. Drama keeps the wiki exciting." Later on in the same post NoNameExists said and I quote "People have their own opinion. I have an opinion that drama makes the wiki exciting. My mind, my opinion, get it Jasbre?" Now you may be thinking "well this is just his opinion, why do you think this should be used against him." Yes. this is his opinion. However, while drama is not directly against the policy (on the wiki at least), it is incredibly frowned upon by a majority of the community. Along with that this wiki was previously shut down as a direct result of drama that was occuring. So an administrator thinking that drama is exciting is incredibly concerning. I know this is from awhile ago but I see no reason to believe this is not still the case. (evidence: )

On January 6, 2020. NoNameExists made an adoption request for PI (a company that is owned by PolarTem). However, adoption requests at the time were against the proposal policy, as per a proposal made by DontAskWhoJoeIs, that passed on January 4, 2020. Now that was at the time a very recent change, but even if Joe's proposal had not passed, this adoption request would still have been invalid. Prior to the new policy on adoption requests, the policy was you could request to adopt fanon work, only if the owner of the work had not edited for 2 years. PolarTem's last edit was on the new wiki on January 18, 2019, which isn't even a year ago, at the moment. (evidence:  )

But maybe I am just nitpicking. It was a simple misjudgement of the proposal policy, nothing too bad, and he accepted it was against the proposal policy not long after I brought it up. Well…

Just over 24 hours after the adoption request NoNameExists made a proposal to repeal Joe's proposal. This alone sounds suspicious, but nothing too bad. When I first saw this proposal it wasn't very clear to me whether the original rule would be in place again or the rule would be removed entirely. So I asked and NoName said "This would change it so if the users haven't edited in 2 months, their articles/companies/spinoffs would be eligable for adoption." This was definitely not what I was expecting, and was mentioned nowhere in the original proposal so chances are this could be considered proposal fraud but, I don’t know. Moving on, if this had passed he could easily have made another adoption request for PI, which is again very suspicious. When I opposed the proposal stating that 2 months was too small, he asked if 6 months would be better, again, PI would still be eligible here. (evidence: )

You may be thinking “but you don’t have any evidence he was doing this for himself, maybe he was genuinely interested in the community’s thoughts on adoption requests?” Except when Jasbre stated about NoName wanting to revive one of his spin-offs, NoName responded with and I quote “Actually I wanted to adopt PI and Box ProdTWOions.” So, he did make this so he could try to adopt PI but he also wanted to adopt Box ProdTWOions. But wait, even if this proposal had passed, Box ProdTWOions would not eligible. The owner, CrazySponge, is still semi-active, along with that, no matter how much I searched, I could not find any evidence that NoName had asked CrazySponge if he could adopt Box ProdTWOions. This all implies he made the proposal because he wanted to adopt something, when he hadn’t even contacted the owner of it. CrazySponge also responded to what NoName had said, with “no and nononononono”. So clearly, CrazySponge did not want NoName to adopt Box ProdTWOions, and may have been completely unaware NoName wanted it. (evidence: )

In late-December a user known as AceBlueWolfe left the wiki on a rather sour note to say the least. He made a blog post making several personal attacks at NoNameExists for blocking Spongefan511. But just recently AceBlueWolfe returned on a new account. When he did this he made another blog post stating he was sorry for the attacks on NoNameExists. In response to a random comment by Jasbre on the same blog Ace said “so lemme guess… you arent happy im back.” In response to this NoName said “I'm definetly not. You're the one who needs to apologize, Ace.” Now, this comment just really annoyed me. I don’t know about you but I personally think it’s incredibly unacceptable as an administrator for NoName to say he’s definitely not happy a user is back just because of one incident, and then say he needs to apologize despite him having already apologized for the attacks in the blog post. (evidence: )

And my final concern about NoName.

On the SBFW Discord server on January 8, there was a joke account impersonating Spongefan511. From the start I was stating it was a joke and NoNameExists was well aware this was not the real Spongefan. The account made several attacks on NoNameExists, at one point going as far as to say he was going to murder NoName. And NoName responded with, and I quote, “If you do anything to anyone I know, I will kill your whole family, torture all your friends, and then burn you alive.” Now you could say, well joke or not, the account initiated it all with the original murder threat. While yes, the account saying that was unacceptable, that should not matter. What if the real Spongefan had said that on the wiki, and NoName responded like that? If he had done that this request would’ve been made a lot sooner. Regardless of whether it was a troll that initiated the attack, NoName still should not have responded the way he did. (evidence: )

Now he did apologize later on for that threat, and went as far as to try to block himself as a punishment. But this does not matter. I do not think at this moment in time NoName is fit to hold the administrator position. I do think he should be allowed to edit, maybe even have a smaller right like rollback, but I don’t think he’s at all fit for the administrator position. (evidence: )

So the TL;DR version of all this.


 * NoName said he thinks drama is exciting (in November).
 * He made an adoption request that was against the policy. (this month)
 * The day after he made a proposal to allow adoption requests, that was unclear and may have been proposal fraud (i am not sure about this so take it with a pinch of salt).
 * Without contacting the owner, he said he wanted to adopt a channel.
 * NoName said he was unhappy to see a user return because they did not apologize for personally attacking them. (the user did in fact apologize to NoName).
 * He made a murder threat to a joke account on Discord, in direct response to the joke account doing the same thing. (he did eventually apologize, and tried to block himself as a punishment).

Again, I do not want this to discourage NoName from editing. I just do not believe he is fit to be an administrator anymore, and I want to see where the community stands on all this.