Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-25004998-20140602144730/@comment-1028990-20140602185618

I'm not sure how having a wordmark that resembles ESB's automatically makes the wordmark bad. In case you happened to forget, our original wordmark was based on the SB Wiki's original wordmark, and nobody complained about that.

Ben's logo is frankly not that good. It's nothing but text, and I'd like some kind of graphic to add to the site's visual appeal. William's background looks cool, and as a compromise, I can replace the middle part of the current background with it without removing the sides.