User blog:The Terrible Travis/Request For Demotion: The Blasted Buffoon Kelpy G

Today I am requesting for the complete and full demotion of none other than the blasted buffoon known as Kelpy G (or as he now calls himself, Squidnerd). Kelpy G is nothing more than a power-hungry oppurtunist that simply wants to advance his goals. He doesn't give a shit about SBFW policy, or the SBFW community at large. He is not fit to be in any position of power at all on this wiki.

Why Kelpy G Should Be Demoted

 * He has shown ignorance, if not complete disregard, when it comes to SBFW policy. Part of being bureaucrat is enforcing our wiki's rules. Someone who either doesn't understand or doesn't care about our wiki's rules shouldn't be bureaucrat.
 * Example #1: When Kelpy G first introduced his "Damn Fool Travis Must Be Stopped" proposal, he originally set it to close in two weeks. He later removed this part, in an attempt to shorten the voting length from two weeks down to one week .  This is despite the fact that shortening of voting lengths is prohibited, as stated in rule #5 of the Proposal Policy.
 * Example #2: After I closed his ridiculous report against me for being invalid, he later re-opened it, saying that he never said it was invalid. The policy that allowed for these types of user reports to exist in the first place was repealed by my The Big (Or As President Donald Trump Would Say...YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE) Policy Overhaul proposal.
 * He's against community consensus. SBFW is a community - the community at large should decide how wiki is run. Kelpy G would prefer that he himself be the final decision-maker. Bureaucrats are supposed to be beholden to the community - people who actively disregard the will of the community shouldn't be bureaucrat.
 * Example #1: His "Damn Fool Travis Must Be Stopped" proposal includes a provision to make it "unamendable for a year". What this means is all the provisions contained in Kelpy's proposal will remain SBFW policy for no less than a whole year. If later during the year, the community decides that they no longer want a provision of his proposal to be policy and would like to have it repealed - they won't be able to do that. They will be forced to continue living with the policy, even if the overwhelming majority oppose it.

Please state whether you support, oppose, or are neutral towards this demotion request in the comments. Votes will be tallied and the result will be decided on January 18th.

&#35;StopSquidnerd (talk) 01:12, January 12, 2018 (UTC)