Thread:Smallcute/@comment-31649947-20170618155256/@comment-28909036-20170620170016

final words in regards to this:

i get that smallcute was a troll, i get they marked a page for deletion without using the correct template, i understand there was more than just them marking a page for deletion. i get that responding like this was probably exactly what smallcute wanted, but i stand by my point.

the page is still shit and should still be deleted. the plot is a sentence long, there's no transcipt, the page was made in 2012 by an inactive author. there's no signifigance to it and if i were still a content moderator i would've deleted it and not had this dumb argument.

i didn't care about why smallcute marked it for deletion, i just felt doing so was justified and keeping the page around won't do anything.

i'm not changing my thoughts on this, but if you really think this useless, shitty, old as fuck stub should be kept around simply because it was marked for deletion, keep it up.